Planned Parenthood Gets a Half-Billion Dollars to Kill Preborn Babies
Yes, you read that right. Nearly a half-billion dollars went to Planned Parenthood in one year:
According to its latest annual report, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) received $487.4 million in tax dollars over a twelve-month period and performed 329,455 abortions.
Previous Planned Parenthood annual reports showed total funding from “government grants and contracts” (which were $363.2 million in 2009), while this year’s report also accounts for payments from Medicaid managed care plans among the payments the group receives from government.
When compared with previous annual reports, the latest one shows an almost steady increase in the number of abortions performed at its clinics: In 2006, Planned Parenthood did 289,750 abortions; in 2007, it did 305,310; in 2009, it did 331,796; and, in 2010, it did 329,445 — a small decrease from the previous year.
Planned Parenthood will say that the money it receives from us – the tax payers – does not go to pay for abortions. PP is playing a game of Three-Card Monte. In its full form, Three-Card Monte is a classic short con in which a shill (Planned Parenthood) pretends to conspire with the mark (that’s us) to cheat the dealer (the government), while in fact conspiring with the dealer to cheat the mark. The money PP receives from “we the tax payers” frees up money that PP gets from other sources to pay for their abortion facilities.
Continue reading at godfatherpolitics.com
If the Constitution was truly based upon Yahweh's morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-9), as some Christians naively believe it is, would American tax dollars be used to finance infanticide? There is hardly an article or amendment that is not antithetical to Yahweh's morality and, in some provisions, hostile to Yahweh's sovereignty.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to Yahweh's moral law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Take our Constitution Survey at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/constitutionsurvey…. and receive a free copy of the "Primer" (an 85 page book, normally $7 plus shipping) of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
-TedRWeilandTED?
How about the 8th admendment? Hum Cruel and unusual?
-heath3435Heath, reading your posts certainly qualifies for cruel and unusual punishment.
What is this gibberish in your next post? "murder is malum in se to the"
-Jeff DixonSo Jeff you diss agree, well that NOT surprising, again The truth be told and and you deny it.
Nice character your showing.
-heath3435Heath, I pretty much disagree with almost anything you post. I can feel confident of two things when I see a post from you. First is that if you have an opinion on something, the truth is the opposite of that opinion and second, you will butcher the english language with your attempt at expressing yourself.
Really, what is this gibberish? "murder is malum in se to the"
-Jeff DixonThis is not nearly as much money as we spent in Iraq killing the post born babies.
Planned parenthood provides health care services that have nothing to do with abortion to many poor woman.
-davesTry again Daves, you really have No clue.
What do you really think planned parenthood really do? Give 2 aspirin,
-heath3435No, they give three aspirin. You have never been pregnant before, have you?
-Jeff DixonLooks like you were Dixon and you gave a birth to an imbecile within yourself too…
-DespevilleHi Humpty. Did you have a nice nap? It is great to see you online. Please provide me your next lie. I look forward to them every day.
-Jeff DixonHere is a lie for you Dixon:
"Dixon seriously engages and reflects on arguments presented to him"
-DespevilleGosh, that is a super good lie too. You are really presenting some super good lies tonight. Thanks.
-Jeff DixonThanks Schizo. I know that you want so hard to believe in them too. I can understand your desire. While that is unattainable for you why don't you come over for a bottle of Bordeaux?
-DespevilleReally good one I just got.
Thanks Humpty. You have done a great job with presenting new lies. Thanks.
-Jeff DixonThey are not new Schizo. They are the only ones I did here and I did them for my funny schizo, you and acknowledged as such too. New concept for you to consider when you plagiarize your Google rubbish as yours…
-DespevilleSuper. That is great. Thanks for the ones you did provide. When you have new ones, I will enjoy reading them.
Also, thanks for admitting you do offer lies. That is also a super nice thing.
-Jeff DixonSure, no problem. Here is another lie for you that you will be all over:
"Dixon will not burn in hell for all of the eternity. He will just rot away."
-DespevilleThat is a great posting too. Thanks for another good lie. So, why no cookie today?
-Jeff DixonThanks I know it is a good one for you in fact will burn in hell but that is not funny at all although you can laugh about it while you have a mouth to laugh with.
-DespevilleGosh, another good lie. Thanks for offering this as well. I know you always try your hardest. You deserve another cookie.
-Jeff DixonNot hard at all Schizoid. I am sitting here sipping my Bordeaux and reading how lie that I lie apart when I disclaim it when I do not and how you lie about what I say was not a lie but confirmation of what you affirmed as a lie… Dig it Schizo?
-DespevilleSuper. But you might want to scale back on the Bordeaux. It seems to be causing some grammar issues. Dig it?
-Jeff DixonNo worries. I am good. I know that spell checking is your passionate hobby but in this instant I attribute it to my speed in typing while watching your schizophrenic mind spinning in circles. Thanks for laughs Jeffo. I know I can always find it with you.
-DespevilleThanks again for the fun lies. I know I can always get them with you. You never disappoint.
-Jeff DixonEhhh that is what I said Schizo… You are parroting again. That usually means that your entertaining value has been depleted. Thanks for playing. It was interesting to see your mind so easily entangled. Satan prepped you so well that you keep your self locked and you check the locks every minute. Go to sleep for that is probably when your mind is the freest.
-DespevilleThanks for the fun lies. You have been a super fun poster tonight.
-Jeff DixonNot a spell check issue. It was a grammar issue. But I am sure you overlooked that as well.
-Jeff DixonStand corrected,3 then.
-heath3435Nope, I guess you have not either. That a good thing.
Like reading your anti-Christian posts is a pleasure cruise, Jeff?
-Linda F.Yes, I am the pleasure cruise of posting. I am glad you are able to detemine that obscure fact. Very few people have that much insight. Congrats.
-Jeff DixonNo you are abomination and a wreck to reason, science, history and human intelligence in general.
-DespevilleScripture is light years away from your blind eyes
Humpty, glad to see on online. I am awaiting your next lie.
-Jeff DixonThanks Schizo. I am on line most of a day. It is a part of business but I just do not come here for there is not much here to learn but a lot to laugh about. Like you and your schizophrenia. So go ahead and start rumbling on with your recent rubbish plagiarized from net.
-DespevilleThat is super. Thanks for providing that valuable information. So, what lie can I expect from you today?
-Jeff DixonI provided one below for your myopic eyes. So here it is again. My sure lie for you:
-Despeville"Dixon is very intelligent and well informed"
Why, yes you did. It is a super nice lie. Thanks for offering it. I enjoyed it very much. i look forward to your next lie as well. Did you get a cookie earlier?
-Jeff DixonThanks Schizoid. No cookies and no comic books either. Kind of grew out of these.
-DespevilleJust Bordeaux.
Super, that is great. Thanks for these insightful new posts. Awaiting your next new lie.
-Jeff DixonSchizoid, this one is not new really. It has been around ever since stupidity showed up but it is a one that you will feel very comfortable with and like it a lot. So here is my next lie for you: "There is no God"
-DespevilleSuper, that is a really funny one. Thanks for offering it.
-Jeff DixonSure, I am glad you like this lie and you find it funny too. Me too and we can both laugh now but wait a second… Isn't that what you plaster all over the internet?
-DespevilleI find all your lies amusing. Thanks for offering even more.
-Jeff DixonYes, atheism is an amazingly stupid lie and on many levels funny too. Thanks for acknowledging that.
-DespevilleSuper. Thanks for even more amazingly stupid lies. I appreciate them all.
-Jeff DixonI know your Schizoid mind cannot catch up but Schizoid when I say I lie and you say I lie when I say I lie that is a double negative which is then really a positive Schizoid.
-DespevilleThat is also super. Thanks for even more absurdity. You can have two cookies.
-Jeff DixonDouble negative is absurdity only in a paranoiac and schizophrenic mind as yours Schizo. You have been caught like a deer in headlights and now all you can do is make your fatuous and neophytic affirmations.
Do not freak out. It is ok. What do you expect from Schizoid as yourself?
-DespevilleThanks again Humpty. I know how tiring it is for you to post. I appreciate you offering such fun lies.
-Jeff DixonAlright. You are depleted. I am leaving you to your ego and that might be a harsh scolding. Untangle yourself now Schizoid and Good night.
-DespevilleThanks for fun postings. You have been a super fun guy tonight.
-Jeff DixonSee "Amendment 8: Bail, Fines, and Cruel and Unusual Punishments" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/biblelaw-constitut….
-TedRWeilandThe Bible advocates stoning to death so the 8th Amendment is definitely at odds with the Bible.
-davesMice try Daves,
You came up with all by yourself, So why are still alive then?
Your taken stoning out of context and do not have that concept what it really means do you.
-heath3435Your just a hatered little man.
Mice try? Sounds like a Mickey Mouse concept to me.
-Jeff DixonYou like that? Thought you would.
-heath3435Oh heath, trying to pretend you wanted to use the word mice? And then you follow it up with saying that daves does not understand stoning. Your delusion is strong.
-Jeff DixonAgain Daves you do NOT have the concept.
Because of Jesus there is no more stoning,so how is the bible advocates?
-heath3435Jesus himself said, The one who does NOT sinn cast the first stone. John 8:7 So show anyone that does NOT sinn here.
The right to the pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is in the Declaration of Independence and the constitution.
-heath3435Murder will always be illegal and always be wrong — murder is malum in se to the
Murder is not always illegal, heath. That is proven by the fact that it's perfectly legal to murder unborn babies.
-Linda F.Linda do you really know what a abortion is or how it is Done?
If you ever seen it it would make you sick and yes it is unusual and cruel murder. Suffer,defencless innocents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malum_in_se
So when is murder OK?
-heath3435As usual, you cannot comprehend what is written. She did not say it was ok, she said it was legal. She is against abortion as well. She merely pointed out that your comment that murder is always illegal is not accurate. (since she considers an abortion to be murder). But then, your comments are rarely accurate.
So, when did the brain damage that you have suffered occur?
-Jeff Dixonhttp://bit.ly/ylMvBk
-DespevilleYes, Humpty. We see you there. It is a very nice little picture. Did you have a cookie with your milk?
-Jeff DixonSchizoid take new meds.
-DespevilleHumpty, glad you joined the conversation. What new lie do you have for me today?
-Jeff DixonHere is my lie: "Dixon you are so intelligent and well read"
-DespevilleSuper, that is so nice. Did you have a nice nap? It is wonderful that you decided to give your great insights. Thank you for the new lie. It is a nice one.
-Jeff DixonI am also looking forward to your next great drawing. They are really nice as well.
-Jeff DixonI still like this one Schizoid and I cannot commit more time to you so here it is again: http://bit.ly/ylMvBk
-DespevilleThanks again. These are all very nice lies. I appreciate them very much. Hope you enjoyed your cookie.
-Jeff DixonNo cookies. Just Bordeaux. Are you coming over or what?
-DespevilleNo, not able to. But thanks for the super new lies. You always provide such interesting ones. Looking forward to the next batch as well.
-Jeff DixonNo problem Schizoid, Although, you would have to take a boat to really come over here and a nice flip flaps too. But since you ask another lie for you and you will like it a lot:
"There is nothing but matter, motion and chaos only"
Isn't that a very nice lie Schizo? Say so…
-DespevilleGosh, that is another great lie since you you do not believe it. Thanks for providing even more lies.
-Jeff DixonWell thanks Schizoid for acknowledging atheism is as a lie. See how you can progress with a bit of humor?
-DespevilleThanks for that new lie. I enjoy them all.
-Jeff DixonWell that was not a lie. That was acknowledged what you said. Therefore it would be indicative of your lie which you did not disclaim as such. That is not not nice Jeffo. Why do you lie and I say I lie and you say you do not when in fact in the end you acknowledged that you did lie?
-DespevilleJust all the other ones, right? Thanks for admitting yet again that you lie. It was super nice of you.
-Jeff DixonSchizo you just have been duped into a double negative… and you went for it like a knife into butter.
Thanks for playing. It was funny to see your schizophrenic mind entangling itself…
You cannot figure out a double negative but you have figured out that there is no God? Hahahhaha Thanks for laughs Schizo.
-DespevilleThanks for the posting. It was super nice for you offer such absurd lies. Looking forward to the next ones.
-Jeff Dixonheath: When did I EVER say that abortion is okay? As Jeff pointed out, I have made it clear – time and time again – that I am opposed to abortion, 100%.
Please read my post again. And this time, take the time to comprehend what I was saying.
-Linda F.That the point Linda, Murder is NEVER legal. Really have to think about it. To resay it for you or anyone else. The ones that promote abortion is just calling it a different name than murder. That is a loop hole.
Please understand and I do not mean to be diss respectful but it has to be called what it really is. And to make it know what it really is as that not many people do know what it is or how it is done. That what my point was.
-heath3435Ted: Please tell me what is this YAHWEH stuff? His Name is JESUS CHRIST and at the Name of Jesus….BOW!!! Yaweh is an Hebrew translation, not the name of Jesus ! Yahweh is the Hebrew translation for Jehoveh!! Got it!! "HIS" Name is still JESUS, "THE Christ of God"!!! You need to study Hebrew to get that buddy!! I know where you can take it to learn it!! LOL
-Homerhttp://www.missiontoisrael.org/3rdcom-pt1.php
-TedRWeiland'This is not how God’s Holy Spirit intended for the Third Commandment to be written. The inspired Third Commandment reads as follows: "
"Thou shalt not take the name of YHWH thy God in vain; for YHWH will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain."
Then take that seriously and stop writing about it only. If you will then perhaps you will stop blaspheming each and every time you make YHVH into your "Yahweh" or whatever other made up name you risk using…
-Despeville"On their own volition, the English translators replaced God’s name with uninspired titles and, occasionally, with the false name “Jehovah.”
Like your "Yahweh" is any more true or correct… Unbelievable hypocrisy on your legalistic and Judaizing part Ted.
-DespevilleYou are a crude manipulator.
And you offer such fun postings. Thanks for being such a swell poster.
-Jeff Dixon
the first time I have seen someone use his name! My Grandfather writes books and goes and proves the books in the Bible…
I don't agree with abortions at all.. If only women could save themselves for that one person of whom they marry there would not be any need for abortions and all that.. I am 20 years old, never had sex so i do not need to worry about unplanned parenthood! maybe people need to learn Yahweh's word and see there wrong! Or read there own Bibles and act "Christian" i have yet to see a Christian act like what they say they are! or whatever religion you are.. Well i appreciate you standing up for His laws
5 and 1/2 weeks- 7weeks and u can hear a heart beat! Stopping a heart from beating is killing! off of u out there murdering theses unborn babies will receive your judgment and have to answer to "God" Yahweh for all the lives you took! so be prepared!
and good luck!
-KennaKenna, good for you!
I'm a Christian pastor.
-TedRWeilandI am not sure about that Ted for you offer no Gospel but law only. No Grace but condemnation. No Jesus but Moses.
No truth about YHVH either for "yahveh" is a man made pronunciation of YHVH which you cannot substantiated in any way, shape or form. Not a scratch it is just as made up as "Jehovah" is…
No go ahead and start your Russian roulette with ripped references to the Word.
-DespevilleNo you are not. You are Mosaic Law proselytizer dressed up as a "pastor" and Christian.
-DespevilleIf you believe that no married women get abortions, you are truly naive.
-Jeff DixonIndeed, the Constitution is NOT based on Yahweh's morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments."
And there is no mandate in scripture that it must be based on these.
Only in the disordered thinking of theocratic nut jobs who would eradicate the Constitutional principle of separation of church and state (and YES, that principle IS in the Constitution) is there an insistence on some allegedly divine plan
for a civil government based on Biblical morality or upon the moral code of any other faith system.
The founders got it right. You have it bass ackwards!
-bighossHoss: "Indeed, the Constitution is NOT based on Yahweh's morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments. And there is no mandate in scripture that it must be based on these."
Let me see if I got this right – then it's okay with Yahweh (the God of the Bible) that the Constitution provides for legislation opposed to His morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments? Hmmm!
There is no moral neutrality in the Constitution, as you are suggesting. It's either harmonious with or opposed to Yahweh's morality. All law represents someone's morality, or, more often than not, immorality.
-TedRWeilandThere is the world and the things of this world, including civil governments, with their imperfection, and there is the kingdom of God on earth, the CHURCH. The two are not the same and never will be the same. God tolerates civil governments not operating on the basis of His moral law, but that does not mean that He approves allof their actions. Christians owe their first allegiance to God's law, but in the event of conflict between God's law and man's law, "We must obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29)
There IS moral authority in the Constitution, Ted. To contend otherwise is irrational.
-bighossHoss, there is no moral authority in the Constitution where it is either antithetical or hostile to Yahweh's sovereignty and morality, in which it is in nearly every article and amendment.
-TedRWeilandThere are many words one might use to describe the laws mentioned in the bible, but perfect is far from being an accurate one. Any set of laws the describes how to handle slaves and allows for the killing of children is the polar opposite of perfect. It is also amusing how no society has ever established a utopia by implementing these "perfect" laws.
-Jeff DixonThe government doesnt control what the individual does. In this country is the freedom OF religion not FROM religion. If your religion is atheism then so be it! The Constitution was creation by all creeds of religions. Definatly God was formost on their minds when the constitution was written. Wakling away from God does not change history!
-Facts givenI am so disgusted that Planned Parenthood, NPR, and ACORN (although under a different name) still receive funding despite the outcry from the taxpayers. We are in dire financial straights and this administration spends lavishly. Shame on all of them.
-PatriotHomosexuality and slaughtering of the innocents are clear signs man has turned from God and will bring our nation under the judgement of God. Even so, come Lord Jesus.
-johnAmen
-JerryAmen
-ccp83Over turn Roe vs Wade and we will stop PP.
-Robert De LeonThere are three main Business with the greatest profits: Abortion, Pornography and Drugs Traffic.
Three front battles we have to fight in order to get back our American heritage..
Robert.
What's yours?
-DespevilleBigger than any of them is Roman global milking network with your charlatans in black dresses performing tricks each Sunday for the gullible public.
-DespevilleThe Constitution is NOT based on any Scripture. Separation of Church and State.
-Miss Vinay DuggalYour ignorance reveals much. The Declaration avows that we have inalienable rights, given by God; these rights which no government has a right to extinguish or limit, are codified in the US Constitution. Learn your history before posting such drivel.
-DntmkmecmovertherA reference to god hardly means it is the biblical god. That is simply the one you want it to be based on.
-Jeff DixonJeff have you not studied history? How is it that men never rememeber those that were popular in their times or their generation. i.e. the Beatles and Elvis Todays generation doesn't rememeber them, or Babe Ruth, or any number of Famous men and women, BUT: how is it that so many billions of peoples from around the world STILL either love that NAME: Jesus Christ or they hate it and reject it! Jesus Christ is "The God and was on the Earth as a man and lived as a man and went thru what we went thru as men and suffered and died and rose again to show us that HE understood and to take away all DOUBT, that HE was/Is exactly who HE said He was! The whole world knows about and has heard about this man who died on the cross of Calvary…OVER 2000 years ago and NONE of us has ever seen Him, BUT we place our trust and faith in The Christ of God" What do you have better than that sir??? In a word…."NOTHING" !!
-HomerAnd billions of people still remember Buddha, Mohammad and Zeus. The number of people who are remembered in history is hardly limited to just Jesus. Perhaps you should study up on your history. You seem to have missed a few facts.
-Jeff DixonYeah, the Founding Fathers were heavily into Greek Mythology! Try as you may, you can't erase the truth!
-DeanWell, they did create this multi-headed Hydra we call the federal government.
-Jeff DixonNeed to re-read the Constitution. It says freedom OF religion not FROM. Get with the facts.
-Lizzy BFreedom of religion includes freedom from religion.
-Jeff DixonFreedom FROM religion is important if you are an American Muslim who has escaped from a Muslim country.
-VladimirJEFF: the worst thing that could possibly happen to you, or anyone else, is for GOD to just ignore you and let you have your way and take no thougt of you and to put you on a shelf! When that happens you are w/out hope and well on yur way to "TROUBLE" A man w/NO vision will perish!! It is NOT religion you need, BUT Jesus Christ and HIS direction and HIS righteousness, Matt 6:33 KJV You've tried everything else, why not try Jesus Christ and recognize, you can't make it on your own!! YOU NEED HELP!! I DID, and I got it!! That's up to you!! Repent or perish!!! Jeremiah 33:3 /Matt 11:28 KJV
-HomerGiven the biblcal gods proclivity to murder on a massive scale, being ignored by him would be a wonderous thing.
However, given that he is just a myth, it is not anything to be concerned about.
-Jeff DixonHUM Murder.
You really do not get it. How did GOD comment murder?
And oh by the way there is only one GOD. That is a concept you DO NOT get!
If your talking about the great flood? Ask your self why? How about sinn in a massive scale?
Then ask your self what did Jesus say or do about death? Then ask your self why.
Until then, you WILL NOT understand.
-heath3435No god commented on murder. You meant committed murder. Your butchery of the language continues unabashed.
And yes, god killing everyone on the face of the earth except for 8 people is wholesale murder.
So, you believe that a one day old infant was capable of sin? Cause according the story, your god killed them too.
-Jeff DixonHow about you Jeff,twisting history.
How do you know a one day old infant died? were you there?
-heath3435God said he will protect all the children by taken them to a place of peace. You look at it as the end but it is not. Now for the people that was old enough to know better went to a different place and it was not of peace. So Jeff that is NOT you are getting and at the rate your going, You will be there also with those people and NOT with the children.
What you do NOT understand. Life does NOT end when you die.Just our bodies here on earth does. But we do live on. Now where is all up to you.
I did not have to be there. The bible says he killed everyone on the face of the earth, except for Noah and 7 other people. Therefore, he killed all the infants in the world during the flood. There are children being born every day. There would have been a one day old child that day as well.
But let us say there were no one day old children that day. Are you also going to claim there were no one week old infants, no 6 month old infants, no one year old infants, that there were no infants at all? That is an absurdity. Of course, there were children that existed during the flood and he killed every single one of them with his worldwide flood.
Well, according to the myth anyway. The flood never occurred in reality. But this is the god of the bible that you say is perfect.
-Jeff DixonJeff again your claims are so far off. Myth, How do we know your piont of view is NOT a Myth?
Again Jeff you claim such lies but facts have been found that the flood was true and so many cultures claim a flood did happen. And they do not have the a bible. So answer me this Jeff because you claim that you know everything, How is that other cultures claim of a world wide flood? How do sea creature are found on mountain top that are younger that the mountains?
Yes land masses do move but it still NOT explain the ages of fossils.
Again your claim are very thin and you can NOT explain it. Science are beginning to find that baible is more accurate than you claim.
-heath3435The 10 commandments are on the doors to the supreme court.
-anthonyNO. Do some basic online research and you will find that this is not true. I have corrected this error so often that I am weary of doing so and will spend no more of my time doing the research for you and other ignorant wretches who never seem to check out anything like this before posting on it.
-bighossNo it doesn't. You are reading into it what isn't there.
-Michael G.Miss Duggal LOL LOL LOL Maam, have you not read the constitution or the Scripture/ KJV Bible! Maam, you have NO idea that the Bible and the constitution go hand and hand! Why the form of our govt is related to the book of Excodus 18 (the 3 branches) and 2 Chronicles and the thanksgiving day we celebrate and the Separation of the church, and Autonomous body) the state in which the state may not run the church but the church may have say in what the state does! The fact that we do not pay tax on church property and money given as tithes see malachi 4 Maam that Bible and constitution are so intertwined together it is not funny! In fact the constitution is 94% directly and/or indirectly taken from a KING JAMES BIBLE (See David Bartons work on the govt and constitution, do a word search on him)
-HomerSure you ain't Gomer? I have scarcely ever seen so much ignorance compressed in such a small space!
As to David Barton, that weasel has been exposed for using FALSE quotations, alleged to have originated from the founding fathers, but not documented in any reliable historical source. Barton is a phony historian and a brazen theocratic manipulator!
-bighossYou will not find Separation of Church and State in the constitution. That phrase is used buy the uninformed. The term seperation of Church and State came from a private letter to the Danbury Baptists by Thomas Jefferson and was his opinion he gave to them that the goverment should make no laws to resrict the assembly of believers. The idea of Seperation of Church and state had to do with protecting Christians and other beliefs. The current idea of seperation of church and state touted by most media is to restrict not protect persons of faith.
-For ChristThe wording is not separation FROM religion or church but of..meaning freedom, but not from God himself or morality.
-joyMiss Vinay—–I have been around for a long time. I can see you are a victim a dumbed- -down system of education which is not your fault. You probably have never been exposed to the Holy Bible which gives an account of what God has done for us and how we as a people either believe or do not believe. We are a fallen race and are prone to go against what God says is right. We inherited this disposition to sin, and rather enjoy it. (I speak from experience). However God knows our problem and has provided a way to escape the payment, (wages) of sin which is death. He sent his Son Jesus Christ who willingly gave his life for this payment which we cannot make. It is a free gift and can be received by simply repenting of your sin, and asking God to save you because you believe this report. I suggest you read this for yourself in the New Testament. Start in the Gospel of John and read it through. It is not a long read. Now to address your statement, "The Constitution is not based on any Scripture", There is no doubt that the principles of the Bible are seen throughout the Bill of Rights as well as the Constitution. There is absolutely no reference to statement Separation of Church and State, found anywhere in these founding documents. I know this is true and am not sure how you can see it
-Robert Burnsunless you study the writings of Jefferson and the Federalist Papers. Today with the internet, you can just put separation of Church and State in the crawler, and you will have all you need to know on the subject. The Bill of Rights begins with
the prohibition of Government making any laws that favors one religion over another. The government is to stay away from this. However, the government is not to prohibit the free exercise of religion either. The supreme Court has addressed this concept on more than one occasion. and that too can be found on the internet ………. Bob
AND the Supreme Court has several times published opinions that clearly validate the principle of separation of church and state.
-bighossHere is a sad fact – the majority of these abortions are for minorities. Try and find accurate statistics on the percentage of various minorities having abortions. In fact, there is a constant pressure (unwritten law) to desguise these abortions as 'necessary medical procedures'. In fact – they are really a form of birth control, which ends up being a genocide perpetrated against the minorities seeking help. That is the 'unintended consequence' of this practice. Liberal proponents refuse to call it by it's factual name. Genocide. How stupid does anyone have to be not to realize this?
-spxzTake a history class Miss Vinay, Read what the founding father wrote ,to give the constitution a definition. The constitution is more than one peice of paper, The letters from the founding father are part of it, Their own act was part of it.
But athiest and same such group want to change that fact.
And seperation church and state, If you knew history then you would know it was a respond to a complaint from the baptist chruch, and Jefferson said that he could not get involve with the church politics and problems.
Again Learn some history.
-heath3435Again people trying to twist the truth and lie. There is NO LAW seperation church and state. It was a ruling from a illegal call of the suprememe court which trample the first admendment. As the first admendment is being trample today.
Yeah, yeah, yeah…same old guardhouse lawyer stuff , garbling the Danbury letter of Jefferson and ludicrously libeling the Supreme Court, accompanied, as usual, by the misspelling of athEIst. "E" goes before "I" on this one, heath.
Letters from the founding fathers blessedly are NOT part of the Constitution, heath. If they were, then we would have a tangle of contradictions to unravel! Very carefully selected writings of the founders are the bread and butter for shabby anecdotal arguments put forth by phony historians like David Barton.
-bighossLook Bighoss, the letters of the founding fathers may not have been a part of the constitution BUT they sure showed the mindset of those MEN who did found this nation and mirrored the constitution! A man;s pen w/words on that paper will mirror the mans mindset! Hence men of the 1700's were ay more men than the congress of today! So, a mans words can be a mans constitution!! The same thought goes that what a man is in private is waht he is in public!!
-HomerIf those letters showed the mindset of the founders, then it is apparent that the sentiments in those letters (or at least the ones held in such esteem by you theocrats) did not make it into the Constitution. The Constitution is a stand-alone document. It means what it says, not what some founding father wrote in some letter to some other founding father or to his blacksmith, for that matter.
-bighossHoss ,
"The Constitution is a stand-alone document. It means what it says, not what some founding father wrote in some letter to some other founding father or to his blacksmith, for that matter."
Wow, your a charactor and it shows,WOW.
Who say the constitution is a stand alone document? Where did you get that infomation?
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. It is the framework for the organization of the United States government and for the relationship of the national government with its citizens, the states, and all those within the United States.
-heath3435Who are you? The typo police? Go back to your hall monitor job and let the grownups continue their discussion!
-DeanYou do not mess around with the typo police. They have no sense of humor.
-Jeff DixonWho does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity in exclusion of all other religions may establish, with the same ease, any particular sect of Christians in exclusion of all other sects? That the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute threepence only of his property for the support of any one establishment may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever? (James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance," addressed to the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 1785; from George Seldes, ed., The Great Quotations, Secaucus, New Jersey: The Citadel Press, pp. 459-460. According to Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, pp. 39 ff., Madison's "Remonstrance" was instrumental in blocking the multiple establishment of all denominations of Christianity in Virginia.)
-Jeff DixonStrongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Govt in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history. (See the cases in which negatives were put by J. M. on two bills passd by Congs and his signature withheld from another. See also attempt in Kentucky for example, where it was proposed to exempt Houses of Worship from taxes. (James Madison, "Monopolies. Perpetuities. Corporations. Ecclesiastical Endowments," as reprinted in Elizabeth Fleet, "Madison's Detatched Memoranda," William & Mary Quarterly, Third series: Vol. III, No. 4 [October, 1946], p. 555. The parenthetical note at the end, which lacks a closed parenthesis in Fleet, was apparently a note Madison made to himself regarding examples of improper encroachment to use when the "Detatched Memoranda" were edited and published, and seems to imply clearly that Madison supported taxing churches. )
-Jeff DixonAnd I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. (James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822; published in The Complete Madison: His Basic Writings, ed. by Saul K. Padover, New York: Harper & Bros., 1953.)
The only ultimate protection for religious liberty in a country like ours, Madison pointed out–echoing Jefferson;–is public opinion: a firm and pervading opinion that the First Amendment works. "Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance." (Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, p. 56. Madison's words, according to Gaustad, are from his letter of 10 July 1822 to Edward Livingston.)
-Jeff DixonWow Jeff,
AGAIN someone elses opinion AND taken out of context as usual,Jeff.
How about instead of useing a opinion of a progessive athiest person, How about what the founding fathers wrote. Those are the facts you need to look at, NOT a Opinion of someone that wrote a progrssive book in the 1987.. Like what Madison wrote in your opinionated book was taken out of context, again twist and turn the truth to fit your lies.
-heath3435Kindly show just HOW those quotes could be within any kind of context that alters their fundamental import.
-bighossYou answered your own question Big hoss.
What I know of you Hoss If I explain it to you, you still will Not understand.
You need to understand how systems work or know what the subject matter is before you can understand.
Like your name, are you bragging about something?
-heath3435Heath, that is because your answers are nonsensical.
-Jeff DixonNo Jeff you all knowing of the universe and top expert, Right?
-heath3435Can You think for your self, Are you able to do YOUR OWN research? Or are you Just a lazy ?
-heath3435Since I do not have a crack team of constitutional attorneys to rely on, or a private jet to fly around it as you claim you do, I am limited to doing my own research.
-Jeff Dixonhttp://bit.ly/ylMvBk
-DespevilleHumpty inserts another meaningless post. He has been working on his artwork for days now and finally displayed it for all to see. It is very nice, Humpty. You can have a cookie with your afternoon milk break.
-Jeff DixonJeff Do you know right from wrong or just the ones that effect you so you adjust to fit your opinions.
Let me educate you, right fit everybody, and wrongs do as well.
You Can not twist a right into a wrong and a wrong into a right,
Right is right and wrong is wrong.
-heath3435right [rahyt] Show IPA adjective, -er, -est, noun, adverb, verb
adjective
1. in accordance with what is good, proper, or just: right conduct.
2. in conformity with fact, reason, truth, or some standard or principle; correct: the right solution; the right answer.
wrong (rông, rng)
adj.
1. Not in conformity with fact or truth; incorrect or erroneous.
2. a. Contrary to conscience, morality, or law; immoral or wicked.
b. Unfair; unjust.
3. Not required, intended, or wanted: took a wrong turn.
4. Not fitting or suitable; inappropriate or improper: said the wrong thing.
5. Not in accord with established usage, method, or procedure: the wrong way to shuck clams.
6. Not functioning properly; out of order.
7. Unacceptable or undesirable according to social convention.
Actually you can change a wrong into a right. Civil disobedience has been appropriately used to change the laws in this country. People break the law in order to show that the law is wrong.
Once again, you demonstrate you have zero reasoning ability.
-Jeff Dixonwho is butcher the english language say say right is wrong and wrong is right.
It clearly show you do not have that concept because your of morals point of views.
Yes history show laws were made that were wrong. But that does NOT prove your point.
That what made this country great because it DID know what right from wrong. But it clearly show people like your self do know the difference.
-heath3435heath3435 80p · 13 minutes ago
who is butcher the english language say say right is wrong and wrong is right.
Yep, that pretty much sums it up right there. You have once again demonstrated an uncanny ability to butcher the english language.
However, my comment on civil disobedience proves my point entirely. Breaking the law is wrong. But breaking the law to change a bad a law allows a good outcome.
-Jeff Dixonhttp://bit.ly/ylMvBk
-DespevilleYou right breaking the law is wrong, but if interpretation of the law is wrong, does not make it a right, That is what your doing. Your interpretation of laws is wrong no matter how you look at it.
You try to twist the law to fit your need and wants which is wrong.
Again your trying to make a wrong a right.That is called twist the truth.
So explain how breaking a law allows a good outcome? For you or a entire population?
That where we have debates with facts instead of oinions of baseless facts.
It is like murder, Is that right? Do you know what Murder is? We have laws for that, so is right or a wrong?
-heath3435heath, is that just a butcher knife or did you perhaps place the English language in a food blender before posting that inchoate drivel?
-bighossTelling the truth and you attack and post something to make noise,Hum
Goes to show who is on here and what charactors of people without faith mock the ones that have faith. The one who mock thinks that they are better or smarter than I or anyone who have faith,Hum.
I never said or will claim to be perfect but the few who mocks refuse to look into the mirror.
Yes I am NOT perfect and never will, And I have news for you, You will never be perfect either!
Twist and turn the truth. It amazed me.
-heath3435Heath, everything seems to amaze you. Probably it is because you are incapable of grasping anything.
-Jeff DixonCould say the same thing about you Jeff!
You really have no clue or concept and the understanding of facts!
But I will pray for you.
-heath3435You could say it. But no one would believe it.
-Jeff DixonAnd heath, the only thing you could educate me on is a new ways to butcher the english language.
-Jeff Dixonagain I show proper english and your degrading it. Hum I wonder.
Keep going Jeff you charator really shows sodoes your opinions of lies
-heath3435These are the baby steps that the eugenic fascists are takiing to "cleanse" the human race of "undesirables" while purporting to "help" the "poor" that they so hate. It is the beginning of the development of the super race like what the Nazis did. This time, it is the poor and then the old that will be sent to the death camps. Soon PPH will be advocating euthanasia for the sick and the old…..don't believe me??? Think back to 1950 and ask yourself, "Would this have been tolerated or even dreamed of in America then"? My, my how far we've come….going downhill………glad I won't be around to see our once great country so degenerated. Thanks Obama. son of satan.
-MICHAEL MORGANSon of Satan or Satan himself
-ccp83Genocide is back in-style with the Obamination Admin. All Obamaination has to do now is grow a funny looking little mustache on his upper lip.
-CHRISTOPHERChistopher, I think I already saw that mustache but I might be mistaken
-PatDon't be fooled into thinking that Planned parenthood is going to walk away w/out paying back the price that was paid by all those 53 Million (approx) babies that were MURDERED! The thing is: P/P has "The God of Heaven to reconcile with, and when he said in Proverbs 6:16-17 that the shedding of innocent BLOOD, is one of the things "HE" hates, you can bet He means it! That BLOOD was shed for NO reason and it cries out to GOD!! He has heard! Trouble is, these "BASTARDS" (NO I am NOT cursing) think it only effects them, yet it has effected many more that have had the abortions and so many women who have killed themselves and gone on to drink and do drugs etc "BECAUSE" Murder is Murder when it is in cold blood and it must be paid back! Damn the Planned parenthood Org. The ONLY plans they really have are to get GAIN!!! The love of money is the root of all evil! 1 Tim 6:10 KJV
-HomerOBAMA WILL HAVE TO ANSWER FOR EVERY BABY HE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING,ABORTION IS MURDER IN THE EYES OF GOD.IT'S THE KILLING OF A HUMAN BEING,HE CREATED LIFE,WE ARE RESPONCIBLE FOR KEEPING IT.
-WHARFRATNot just obama but everone responsible from the day it became legal to commit infanticide in America.
-JerryHow can anyone claim to be a follower of Crist and either stand by and let this happen or even say it is ok, answer, just because you say you can fly a plane doe's not mean you can. They cannot be.
-JerrySorry about the misspelling I get very upset when I even think about the horror that is being commited in this country and around the world. I hope you know I meant to type "Christ".
-Jerrywhat about president bush? there were just as many abortions happening then as there are now. admit it to yourself you just hate obama
-butchLiars for Jesus. The headline is a total ****ing lie. You Christians should be ashamed of yourselves. They do not spend all that money on abortions.
LIARS
-ChrisThere is not a bigger LIE than do not recognize that GOD created the whole Universe. Even if PP spent only ONE dollar on an abortion, PP commit a murder.
-Robert De LeonRobert.
WOW Chris.
Wake up man, Get your head out of that hole in the ground. Get in the real world and STOP listening to satan himself.
Unless you like being his poppet! And he is useing you, Just by your comments he is useing you.
You talk about murder in the Bible? What you think PP is doing for Satan?
-heath3435Chris, I have two words to say to you. One is "shut" and the other is "up". Shame on you.
-Nancy SternbergFather God , Please bring your judgement down on the baby murderers and the abominable homosexuality that has taken over this great nation that you sent your people to be able to worship you and to keep in your grace, your people have suffered at the hands of evil people under satan's control and even some worship as their god. I do not want my loved ones to perish without giveing their hearts and soul to you and excepting you as Lord and Saviour. This country is as you say in the Revelation has lost their first love. I do believe that you great commision to preach the word thru out the world has come about and there is no not one who doe's not know your name and have either excepted or rejected you. How long oh Lord, come Lord Jesus come.
-Jerry…And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O LORD, bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits, in Thy mercy." And the LORD did grin and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit bats and large chu… [At this point, the friar is urged by Brother Maynard to "skip a bit, brother"]… And the LORD spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin, then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it."
-Jeff DixonThe Original Constitution is based on Christian theology,but these Progressive/Liberal judges are interpreting it wrong,making UnConstitutional laws,like abortion.
-Bryon'All men are created equal,with the Right to Life,Liberty,and the pursuit of happiness'.
Even precious little unborn babies……..how sad it is.
-joyThe so called pastors and ministers and church leaders who do not take a stand against the immorality and the murdering of babies are as guilty as thos ewho commit these horrorable acts. If you will not stand up and admonish those in your church about supporting or not doing anything to stop this then you should step down from the pulpit. Jesus said to give unto ceasur what is ceasurs, we as Christions cannot allow the corrupt and the evil men in washington and the courts to continue to turn America away from its very foundation. The Churches of today are being run as a business and have left the law of God behind for the love of money.
-JerryJerry, just which false church do you attend. With a personal relationship with Jesus and a bible preaching church, the Lord loves and leads His flock. Get straight with God or get what you are asking for.
-Payson DaveWhich Christian theology was that? The one that said to keep blacks as slaves and for women to be second class citizens with no voting rights? Or the one that permits religious freedom despite the First Commandment? Perhaps it is the freedom of speech even though that violates the Second and Third Commandments?
-Jeff DixonNice try and twist again Jeff,
You going to fail and keep failing.
-heath3435If nympho idiots want to abort so they can easily start over on the next one… I don't give a damn! Their offspring would just be more idiots, and all the Bible verses in the world won't change them! I just don't want taxpayer dollars paying for their so called choice!!!
-AirMotorYes, they want to abort one child so they can get pregnant with another child. That might qualify for the dumbest post of the day. Congrats.
-Jeff DixonThe churchs are afraid that there tax statues will change, right or wrong. Most don't say anything against abortions because most are black (mom want money for children). From day wade us roe was passed until summer of 2008 there had been 37million black abortioons in the u.s. How much money would that have cost ? The demo want black to need there help for all there needs, then they can control there votes. Churchs will not take a stand therefore they don't have to have food blanks etc. for there folks. Sorry but i think this is true.
-DAVThere's more to Planned Parenthood than abortions. I'm NOT saying that abortion is right, but here's a thought: how about make it so PP can give the OTHER services that they provide to low income women and make a stand against abortion. How's that? It's called "freewill". Here's another fact as it stands right now: most women, under the current law, give birth to children because they choose to. Under "pro-life" they will HAVE TO give birth to children. It's funny how the media doesn't cover THAT aspect of it.
-DavidHow about this, If you do NOT want Children DO NOT HAVE SEX? HUM?
OR Get fix so that you CAN NOT get pregnat?HUM?
What a concept
-heath3435Great ideas! Problem: how many will actually FOLLOW those ideas? Be realistic now. How is that "Don't have sex" thing working for you? I got "fixed" so I wouldn't have kids but others won't. Keep in mind: this is the 21st century – so much to hate about it, such as the "blame game" (i.e. accountibility and responsibility are just 2 words in the dictionary now).
-DavidYour right so very right David, that is what happen to us, People are NOT held to accountibilty and not being held to take responsibility of self satifying acts.
-heath3435It needs to go both ways man/females. Like what I have been saying, people think what WAS right is NOW wrong, and what WAS wrong is now right. That what the sociality is teaching, Like abortions. every one is talking about it BUT nobody is talk about what it really is and we are condemn for trying to explain what it is.
Yes this is the 21 century, but we as people still have responsibility and still have to be accountible for our actions and TAKE responsibilty for such action.
We are responsible for our own actions, not the actions of others. We cannot control another person. Also note: you can have ALL the laws you want but that does not mean that people will follow them. Outlaw abortion, for example, but DO NOT be fooled that there will never be another abortion. Cocaine was outlawed and people still snort it on a daily basis. Accountibility and responsibility are all but gone. Sad but true. Welcome to the 21st century – so much to hate about it.
-DavidYes this is the 21 century,And yes we are responsible for our own actions, but it does not give permission to give up the truth. Yes laws can be made and yes there will be some that will brake them, but in reality doing such action will reduce such action and the ones that break the laws will have consequences to pay where today there is NO reperccusions for their actions done today In this world, Believe it or not but when people do what they do,Like abortions and drugs and braking laws it effect everyone.
So my point is, there has to be a set of standers for everyone like what in the bible to govern by. But to hate it is Not for us, but what we can do is love and teach what is right and wrong by being truthful. We may get persecuted for it but the truth will win in the end.
-heath3435The jerks in Washington keep trying to put band aids on the economy, but do not correct the source of the problem! A trillion here, a trillion there, a trillion everywhere – bankrupting our country!
Since demographics is what drives the economy, I believe that biggest source of the problem is the abomination of law passed by bigoted, immoral, liberal supreme court justices called Row v. Wade. Since the passing of this law FROM THE BENCH, over 50 million little, defenseless babies had their heads crushed and their brains sucked out just because women could not keep their legs crossed, because some found that having a baby was inconvenient or because Planned Parenthood talked people into abortion in order to increase their profits. (They should NOT receive federal funds.)
Roe v. Wade was passed in January 1973, so those aborted would have been 0 to 39 years old. They would have required that schools were built, roads were updated, required a larger energy grid and that at least 20 million more homes/apartments were built. They would have gotten married, had children, raised families, bought a house or rented an apartment, bought clothes, bought food, bought refrigerators, computers, cell phones, books, washers, dryers, dish washers, furniture and many more products that would have caused more factories to be built to manufacture these products and more stores to sell them in.
Now, because of Roe v. Wade, we have had over three years of recession with no sign of an end. In fact, we are looking forward to ten to twenty years of more of the same.
To fix the problem, we need to reverse Roe v. Wade and it would help to instill better morals in all our citizens. GOD is punishing us through the use of simple economics. The application of Keynesian economics IS NOT the solution!
Want to know more about this, go to: http://www.hsdent.com/The_Dent_Methods#Birth%20Ra…
Dear Baby,
by Mallory Page Lowe,
Although I cannot see you,
I still know you are there.
You are warm and snug inside me,
and require gentle care.
Although I cannot hold you,
or give you a hug goodnight.
I feel you move inside me
and know that you are alright.
Although I cannot kiss you,
or show you how I feel.
I know you share my feelings
and that our bond is real.
…..you are with me all the time
-Smittyand always on my mind.
Already I have fallen in love
with my precious gift from up above.
This should be expected when your president is the preparer for the anti-Christ if not the antiChrist himself . I mean who else could be this incompetent and still keep so many of his followers enthralled .
-buckReagan did it.
-bighossI know what is like to have someone try to force you to have an abortion. I lost everything after my youngest was born, home marriage, what few possessions I had. Yet had I not had my children I would have not learned that God is merciful and the restorer of all things or continued to think I deserved the abuse I was getting. Kansas City would not have a technician in one of its hospitals, or someone to clean your house in Searcy, Arkansas. I thought I could not do this on my own with God's help and blessing.
-Nancy SternbergThe ONLY "constitution" which separates church and state is the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO !! Our Constitution DOES NOT have any clause which separates church and state. GOD is definitely ANGRY with America for actions taken by this administration, and prayers should be "Please relent of YOUR anger" and apply II Chronicles 7:14 to America today.
-HootAccording to Senator John Kyl, it is even worse than you think. Check THIS out. Warning: if you don't understand satire, don't go here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/13/jon-kyl-…
-bighossHoot, you and others need to go back to junior high and take an elementary civics course.
-bighoss