This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

Where Christianity intersects with politics, culture, and entertainment.


commonsense

Have We Lost Our Common Sense?

The world is in a desperate state of affairs. Social institutions – the family, schools, and churches – are falling apart. Society is breaking up into warring factions. Truth has become irrelevant and unfounded rumors and opinions take precedence over facts and knowledge. There are no genuine standards of behavior anymore because all morality has become merely relative. People are becoming increasingly uncivil toward one another. Money and power appear to rule the day. We seem to have lost our common sense. Can we do something about it?

Yes, we can! We need to return to Realistic Philosophy, the philosophy of Common Sense, Examined and Expanded. This return to genuine realistic thought, which was both the source and the rationale for Western Culture, is exactly what is needed if we as a nation are to protect ourselves from the “intellectual barbarism” that is so prevalent today and is the major influence on contemporary affairs.

Philosophy is the attempt to understand the most basic facts about the world we inhabit and so far as possible to explain these facts. This enterprise is not the exclusive concern of certain specialists, but one in which every human being is deeply involved, whether or not he is clearly conscious of it.

Every way of life is based upon a way of looking at life. The way you look at life is your philosophy. Just as there are many ways of life, so are there many philosophies, some more true and some less true. So important is this basic enterprise of man, so much hinges upon the avoidance of confusion and error, that since the time of the ancient Greeks a certain discipline has been set aside for the concentrated consideration of philosophical problems and for the careful comparison and criticism of different ways of answering them. This discipline is called philosophy.

Continue reading at www.themoralliberal.com
 
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Deep_Thinker

    Morality is, should, and always has been relative.

    No one has a right either through law or societal norms to impose morality on another.

    The author of this article has lost "common sense".

    • http://youtu.be/zjgBhpanOfQ Despeville

      In a ontological sense morality is not relative but its application and interpretation widely so according to the level of epistemological consciousness of society and individuals.

      • Deep_Thinker

        Agreed, but when the author says "genuine standards of behavior" – it boils my blood. Societal norms should not produce moral norms on an individual.

        • http://youtu.be/zjgBhpanOfQ Despeville

          Agree when those norms go wacky as in the past and as it is going to repeated.

        • Evermyrtle

          Boiling blood can lead to a stroke or to a heart attack or sometimes cause us to make fools out of our selves. … You better cool it, allow everybody believe as we please. After all, GOD gives us that right from the very first. We can advise which is our right , we cannot force anybody to believe anything.

    • Kenneth

      So what is your definition of "morality", Deep Thinker? Who is trying to impose "morality on another?" There are some things that common sense and decency dictate to all people. I just don't get thinking like this.

      • Deep_Thinker

        Morality is something that an individual chooses to live his life by. It is his level of what is acceptable for him to do or not. It is what his consience tells him to do or not do. The problem (and where you are probably getting confused) is that morality does not equal law. Yes, laws are immoral, but not all immorality is unlawful.

        Take for instance, cheating on your spouse: It is immoral, but not illegal. Some might choose to say its moral, but we know its not. The two get confused, especially when one religious group tries to codify into law their moral viewpoints. That is tyranny, and you cannot forget that when a choice is made out of obedience to a law, (rather than a conscious decision that one has the ability to choose to do or not do) it is not a moral choice, and holds no moral value.

        • Eric

          You've got some serious issues in your deep thinking. Morality is not individualistic. If it was, then what is moral for me, may not be moral for someone else. How could you hold anyone accountable for any action if morality is completely subjective? Morality DOES equal law. What else could it possibly be? Otherwise. law would be completely arbitrary. Adultery IS illegal, according to God's law. The fact that it is not a crime according to civil law is irrelevant.

          In fact, you told me yesterday that theft is illegal according to God's law. You are right, but do you wish to hold others accountable to this moral viewpoint? If you do, by your own definition, you are a tyrant. Theft is illegal because it is wrong, and it is wrong because God said it is. Morality and law are inextricably linked. Law is built upon someone or someones' morality. Making the statement that something is "not legal to do" is an imposition of a particular moral belief.

          • Deep_Thinker

            You are confusing God's law and man's law. So should adulterers go to jail?

            You are speaking nonsense and are either illiterate or have to do some deep thinking.

            Morality does equal God's law, spiritually. But how can you police morality when morality exists within us, in our thoughts? Morality is not something you can touch.

            Morality does not equal law. Like I explained before. If there is no victim, or no harm done to another person, I can do whatever I please. Now if I do cause harm to someone, I should be held accountable.

            And lastly, in the end, will God judge us individually, or collectively?

          • Eric

            "You are confusing God's law and man's law." No, I am simply not separating them as you are doing. Should all men obey God or not?

            "So should adulterers go to jail?" No, no one should be "in jail." Restitution is the biblical principle, not slothful isolation.

            "Morality does equal God's law, spiritually." Good.

            "Morality does not equal law." Bad. So apparently spiritual truths have no practical value in the physical world. Is this really what you believe? Was your great-great-great-grandfather named Pilate by any chance?

            "Morality is not something you can touch." And neither is law. (And you can't touch green, nor happy, nor clever, nor deep, nor any concept for that matter.) So what's your point. Are you really claiming that if it's metaphysical it's not "real"?

            "If there is no victim, or no harm done to another person, I can do whatever I please." Please define "victim" and "harm" then. Make sure to take a peek at Matthew 5-7 before answering. (Hint: This is where Jesus said that spiritual things, like thoughts, do have physical ramifications and CAN be judged.)

            "And lastly, in the end, will God judge us individually, or collectively?" Yes. Sheesh, I already answered this yesterday. Haven't you been "thinking deeply" about it since then?

          • Deep_Thinker

            Do all men obey God?

            Adulterers should pay restitution, really? Should my dirty thoughts cause me to pay restitution also?

            And no, metaphysics is bs. If I say something that makes you sad, tough crap. I am not to be held accountable. I don't have to define harm and victim, it's known, just like gravity is known to exist, we know what harm and victim are.

            Should I be allowed to drink raw milk, smoke pot, have free speach? In your world, I shouldn't. I guess we should all be slaves.

            Should we all follow one religions way of moral living? There are many Gods for different people. Yes, we believe there is one true GOd but our founders allowed for any God to be worshipped. You seem to think otherwise…

            I already said some morality is in law, but not all. We are talking physical law in this world, not spiritual. You want to confuse the two.. Not all immoral acts are unlawful and cause punishment. Is this that hard for you to get into your thick skull?
            Looks like you haven't been thinking too deeply except trying to justify your own belief.

          • Eric

            "Looks like you haven't been thinking too deeply except trying to justify your own belief."

            Not really, I was just trying to force you to speak loudly and clearly your Jeffersonian anti-Christian worldview. Ole Thomas would be proud.

          • Deep_Thinker

            I'm christian, but I'm libertarian. The two are actually in conjunction with each other.. If you would like to go back in time and argue with our founders about our belief go ahead.

            I'm sure any fascist dictator would love to have you on his payroll..

          • Evermyrtle

            I follow GOD plan rather than man's ideas

          • Deep_Thinker

            "So apparently spiritual truths have no practical value in the physical world. Is this really what you believe?" – Sure they do, but you can't force them on other people via man's law..

          • Eric

            Except that one about not stealing though, right? That one's OK to force on people, but not the one about adultery…

          • Deep_Thinker

            Theft is taking someones property so yes, it can be put into law.

            Again, I can do whatever I want as long as I don't harm a man or his property. Is this really that hard for you to grasp?

          • Eric

            Yes, it is rather difficult. Please teach me more, o Deep one. I'm really torn between believing you or the Bible… ;)

          • Deep_Thinker

            The bible is in line with my beliefs. The bible wouldn't force morality on a person, we do have free will… The bible spells out what is moral, but doesn't say use force to apply those morals.

          • Eric

            Oh, so when Jesus commands us to follow Him, what He really meant, but forgot to say was "but only if you want to. It's cool either way. I don't want to impose my morality on you."

          • Deep_Thinker

            Actually yes, he does command us to follow him, but tell me how you could force other people to do so? He does give us free will.

            If it's not a choice, it holds no value.

            Tell me how if I chose not to follow him on this earth, I would be forced to?

            Tell me how we should be punished on this earth for not following him? The punishment is at judgment day.

            You cannot legislate morality.

          • Eric

            What is it with you and "being forced to"? The only one bringing up force is you. It's your mythical boogeyman.

            Do you not believe that there are consequences for denying Christ here on this earth? Jesus commands us to follow and obey Him. End of story. It's not up to me to force you (or anyone else) to do it.

            It's also not up to me to stone adulterers. These are civil affairs. The fact that the civil government doesn't follow God's Law does not get me (or you) off the hook of obedience. The fact that adulterers appear to get away with their sin in this world does not mean that they actually do.

            "You cannot legislate morality." Theft is a moral issue, is it not? Do you pay your taxes? If you do, then you are acquiescing to human tyranny by submitting to what you call theft. If you don't, you are disobeying Romans 13. So which is it: do you obey God or your libertarian ideals?

          • Deep_Thinker

            You don't want to force religion in schools? You don't want to enforce regulations against homosexuality?

            It's not a matter of if I want to follow God's law or not. It's a matter of if I have a choice to do so.

            Theft is a moral issue, and like I have explained many times, not all immorality is harming another or his property, like theft.

            We should have the choice to follow God's law, which means keeping laws that are victimless out of the legislature. Which also means not using the legislature to further your religious beliefs.

          • Eric

            "You don't want to force religion in schools? You don't want to enforce regulations against homosexuality?" No. Why do you assume that I would? I want the state OUT of most of what it has itself entangled in.

            "It's not a matter of if I want to follow God's law or not. It's a matter of if I have a choice to do so." This doesn't even make sense. You can always follow God's law, regardless of what man's law states. Sure, it may mean civil sanctions, but you can still obey God rather than men. Besides, you don't have a choice. This is God we're talking about, not your local HOA dictator. Every knee shall bow, willingly or otherwise… but I suggest willingly.

            "like I have explained many times" No, you haven't. You have stated it many times but you have never actually "explained" it.

            "not all immorality is harming another or his property, like theft." Please explain (not just re-state) how theft "harms" you. If I steal from you I am doing nothing to your physical health or safety. Especially tell me how theft harms the property itself. And after you are done with that, please explain to me how adultery is a victimless crime.

            "We should have the choice to follow God's law, which means keeping laws that are victimless out of the legislature." What are victimless laws?

            "Which also means not using the legislature to further your religious beliefs." Again, I never said I wanted this to be done. You also seem to be one who hears what he wants to hear.

          • Evermyrtle

            Deep…………………..To one who has all the answers. Watch were you get them, some of your answers are incorrect.

    • Ken

      So by saying "no one has a right…", aren't you defining a morality and imposing it on others? What do you mean by a "right?" If morality is indeed relative, then who are you to tell anyone what he can or can't do?

      • Deep_Thinker

        A right is something you can choose to do or not do, so long as you do not aggress against another person. I can smoke pot, if I want. It's my right. But I can't hold and hit another person, because I am infringing on his right to walk and harming him.

        • Ken

          In some cultures–dare I say, those devoid of morality–it is perfectly ok to hold and hit another person.

          Many in an inner city gang environment, for example, would consider it within their "rights" to severely beat or even kill a person who looked at them disrespectfully.

          You, thankfully, are on a higher level where you consider it wrong to do such a thing.

          • Deep_Thinker

            That's fine but all a right is, is a property right. Woman's rights, are really property rights for a woman in her own body. I don't care what society, or a group calls a right. I believe in the natural right of property over my own body, given from God.

        • Evermyrtle

          It is our right to smoke pot or drink intoxicating drinks and then get into our automobiles and drive like a lunatic and somebody gets killed. That is a right that we don't have.

    • M Green

      And yet, we do–and rightfully so. Otherwise, it's anarchy. For instance, it is morally wrong to rape someone AND it is also illegal.

      • Deep_Thinker

        We tell people they shouldn't harm others. We go to far when we tell them they can't smoke pot, can't say certain things, can't worship as they please. Why? Because those rules don't directly harm another person.

        It's called the Non Aggression Principle. I can do whatever I want, as long as I don't harm another person.

      • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

        M Green, yet your god approved of using rape.

        Isaiah 13:16
        New Living Translation (NLT)
        16 Their little children will be dashed to death before their eyes.
        Their homes will be sacked, and their wives will be raped.

        • Deep_Thinker

          I actually think (and I'd have to check) but that is probably a prophecy in Isaiah, not God approving of anything.

          • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

            It is a prophecy.

            Here is a link to the entire verse. But let me pull out part of it.
            http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaia

            The Lord Almighty is mustering
            an army for war.
            5 They come from faraway lands,
            from the ends of the heavens —
            the Lord and the weapons of his wrath —
            to destroy the whole country.

            God himself was amassing the army which shall dash the heads of infants and rape women.

          • http://youtu.be/zjgBhpanOfQ Despeville

            Hmm, tell us something from your stories… Like about your branch swinging baboon super grandma…

          • Deep_Thinker

            The NIV, unfortunately is crap. Many things are taken in a different context from previous translations. See if this doesn't sound different:

            the Lord of hosts mustereth the host of the battle.

            5 They come from a far country, from the end of heaven, even the Lord, and the weapons of his indignation, to destroy the whole land.

            6 Howl ye; for the day of the Lord is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty.

            7 Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's heart shall melt:

            A bit different don't you thnk?

    • blackhawk

      God gave us a scamatic : It's called the TEN COMMANDMENTS. It's how to lead one's life. Please don't tell me Christ's coming did away with it. You also have free will. Follow it or dont ; It's your choice. HE will not force you.
      America is and was a Christian and Jewish Nation .The signers didn't want government dictating a religion BUT they also did not want the plebes to make it illegal ANYWHERE.

      • daves

        plebe
        n
        A first-year student at the U.S. Military Academy or the U.S. Naval Academy.

        plebe [pliːb]
        n
        (Military) Informal a member of the lowest class at the US Naval Academy or Military Academy; freshman

      • Evermyrtle

        You are correct. Why would JESUS coming do away with HIS FATHER'S laws, make no sense, none at all.

    • Dionesius3

      Morality is NOT and has NEVER been relative.
      Morality is as set in stone as your head is made of stone.
      Morality is nothing more and nothing less than the Law of the Land.
      ALL LAWS are someone's morality legislated.
      Where on earth is there a society that lives without MORALITY?
      Where are there people who are held to be heros who run from battle?
      Where is a society in which it is though GOOD to have sex with anyone you want any time you want?
      Where is there a people who believes rape to be a virtuous act?

      • Deep_Thinker

        So whatever the leaders or your land proclaim is law are your morals?

        Do you not realize that when morality is not a choice, but forced on us by a law, it holds no value?

        Can you touch morality?

        Is there no subjectivity in it at all?

        Your telling me you believe homosexuality is moral, because our laws don't outlaw it?

        • Evermyrtle

          Christians do not need man's laws to have and to keep morals. We use GOD'S ten commandments. They are always "UP TO DATE!"

          • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

            Then why are you not out stoning non-virgins on their wedding night or people who work on the Sabbath (assuming you can determine which day it should be practiced on)? The bible says to do this, yet the laws of man say it is a crime. You are not following your gods laws, but actually following the laws of man when you do this.

          • http://youtu.be/zjgBhpanOfQ Despeville

            What would baboons (I am using this name facetiously) i.e. your asserted ancestors would say Dodxon?

          • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

            More babble from the master of the language.

      • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

        The Ghotul System of Education

        by K. L. Kamat
        First Online: January 20, 2002
        Page Last Updated: January 02, 2012

        The author writes about the fascinating system of education prevalent among the tribals of Central India, known as Ghotul.

        "In Ghotuls, no distinction is made between love and sex. Everybody is free and behaves responsibly. In the beginning, they may sleep together as the brothers do with sisters, and as their hormones begin to operate, they may go further. I do not believe that there is any other society where a brother and a sister can sleep in the same room with their respective lovers."

        • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

          "Since sex is considered a very natural phenomena at the Ghotuls, there arise no perversions. Sex is seen as natural as hunger or sleep. In some civilized societies, sex is considered to be a man's right and woman's duty, whereas at the Ghotul, it's a Motiyari's privilege and the Chilak's duty. Since partners are continuously rotated, every pair gets a chance sooner or later. Although dating is restricted to Ghotuls, it is not uncommon for the couples to meet outside the Ghotul, in the forest or at the river. If someone finds out, both of them are punished. If a Motiyari singles out a boy to treats him specially, she's punished by the other boys. Because of their sexual freedom, at the time of marriage, neither is the bride a virgin, nor is the groom inexperienced."

          • Evermyrtle

            "GROSS!"

    • Winston

      If morality is relative then a society of lawlessness has no bounds. It is the belief and practice of moral relativism which is destroying American values of old…because the words of God in the Bible are proved out when it tells us "there are those who do right in their own eyes but it leads to destruction". Therefore, moral relativism is a form of self-worship…a lie of Satan in the world.

  • Robert De Leon

    COMMON SENSE IS DEATH

    Today we grieve the death of a dear friend, Common Sense.
    Actually nobody knows how old was he due that its birth certificate was lost into the Bureaucracy’s maze.
    Common Sense will be remembered juts because it gave us some lessons as to work in order to have a house and a decent way of living; you need to read daily just a little; you must know why early birds get their food and to recognize some valid phrases such as “life is not always fair but maybe it’s my fault”.
    Common Sense lived under simple and reasonable instructions: do never spend more than you owe; adults are in charge, not children; be kind and polite.
    Common Sense begun to lost its health when some inefficient rules were applied, such as: “You are informed that your child was accused from sexual assault because he kissed in the forehead to a girl”; “a couple of teen-agers moved to another high school because they accused a school companion dealing with drugs”; the school teacher was dismissed because she reprimanded her pupil for bad behavior”.
    Common Sense’s health got worse when parents began to attack teachers because these made the task parents should make: discipline their children. When teachers should ask permission to parents in order to give an Aspirin to their son/daughter, to put a Band-aid or an ointment for sun protection but keep quit if a girl was pregnant and wanted to abort.
    Commons Sense didn’t want to live when the Ten Commandments was a matter of fun; everything was relative; induced abortion was a “right”; and criminals were treated better than their victims.
    Common sense died after its father, Truth; its mother, Discretion; and its brothers and sisters, Responsibility, Confidence and Good Behavior.
    Its step-brothers still are living: “I know my Rights, “Put the Blame on Someone Else”, and “I am a Victim from Society”.
    Nobody attended to its burial for nobody knew Commons Sense past away.

    • Dionesius3

      Morality is NOT and has NEVER been relative.
      Morality is as set in stone as your head is made of stone.
      Morality is nothing more and nothing less than the Law of the Land.
      ALL LAWS are someone's morality legislated.
      Where on earth is there a society that lives without MORALITY?
      Where are there people who are held to be heros who run from battle?
      Where is a society in which it is though GOOD to have sex with anyone you want any time you want?
      Where is there a people who believes rape to be a virtuous act?

  • keyboardshark

    "We need to return to Realistic Philosophy, the philosophy of Common Sense, Examined and Expanded. "

    No, we simply need to return to the Bible, and get rid of the moral relativism that has caused so many problems in society.

    • Deep_Thinker

      Society doesn't have problems, individuals have problems.

      • Eric

        So then what exactly is a society if not a collection of individuals?

        • Deep_Thinker

          Society is a collection of individuals, but without individuals, there is no society.

          Does society have a moral problem? No, individuals do..

          • Eric

            "Society is a collection of individuals"

            And yet you maintain that when the individuals within that society have moral problems, the society remains unaffected by the "moral problem"? So even though individual cows are diseased, the herd is doing just fine? OK, makes perfect (non)sense to me…

          • Dionesius3

            So, mental moron, according to your reasoning Nazi Germany did not have a Moral problem. That speaks volumes as to your level of reasoning and intelligence. No society is ever a reflection of the values of mere individuals. Societies by definition are groups of individuals united by a common set of core beliefs, practices, or actions. I am not sure what has led you to become so absolutely blind to the errors of you logic but it does need major correction in this area.

          • Deep_Thinker

            Of course they did idiot, they caused harm to other people, and their property (as in their bodies)…

            Not only that, no without individuals you have no society. Our society doesn' t all have the same beliefs? Our society allows for all beliefs, so long as they don't harm another…

            Dionesius, what a crock o sh**

      • Robert De Leon

        You have to change your motto.
        Society can't exist without individuals. What affect individuals affect Society. As simple as that.
        Robert.

        • keyboardshark

          Exactly, Robert.

  • msjallen

    Common sense will return when a great number people in this Nation turn back to God, learn His ways through His Word and apply it to their daily life. As goes the believer, so goes the nation.
    I Tim 2:1-2 First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.
    Col 2:10 and in Him you have been made complete, and He is the head over ALL rule and authority;
    Luke 18:27 But He said, "The things that are impossible with people are possible with God."
    II Peter 3:8… but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory, both now and to the day of eternity.

  • Alex

    What a hoot!! so let me quote Deep_Thinker "Morality is, should, and always has been relative." Do you suppose he really believes this? If D_T is a naturalist, asserting that all things are just physical and without a Creator then the meaning he ascribes is his own; but he does not stop there he says that "we know". What if your thoughts, D_T are just chemical reactions and nothing more? That your brain is an organ which produces thoughts? ….just like the gall bladder produces bile.

    • Deep_Thinker

      Some people believe homosexuality is moral, some don't. Is that not relative?

      • Alex

        Wow, dude….thats' deep.

        • Eric

          :) I know, right?

  • Mistertea

    'Common sense' doesn't exist anyway. You walk down the street and ask ten different people for an opinion on a matter, you'll get ten different views. But each of them thinks their own view is 'common sense' and the others are wrong.

    • Dionesius3

      And what does that comment have to do with anything?
      You are a perfect example of how "Common sense" is indeed vanishing from our society.
      "Common Sense" has always meant "that which all reasonable people at all times hold to be true", and as such it means that "Conventional Wisdom" is nothing more than "Common Sense" adapted for the present situation. "Conventional Wisdom" sometimes remains a part of "Common Sense" for a time but then falls away. "Conventional Wisdom" sometimes becomes a part of "Common Sense". It is a somewhat fluid thing but it is not something an "Individual" can claim any real part in altering or changing.

  • Eric

    I said nothing about treating them. Is the herd diseased or isn't it? If you have a potential buyer and he asks if the herd is healthy, what will you tell him? Will he share your psychotic delusion that the herd is fine because not "all of them" are diseased?

    • Deep_Thinker

      You say some are, and some aren't. You can't say they all are can you? I never said the herd is fine. You assume if I don't say it's diseased it's fine, but i didn't. I said some of the individual cows are.

  • PTTA

    Jesus told us, in the New Testament, "The widom of the world is foolish and silly, but Lords wisdom is eternal. Which do you want. Think the widom of the world isn't foolish? I give you any politician.

    People who are not saved, and do not have he Holy Spirt as a teacher, think that the Widom of the bible, the Lords words, was for back then somewhere, not for today, and that wisdom, the Lords widom is foolish. But tell me once the Lord laid out his laws, where he has ever changed his mind? It is mans way of trying to justify hos own existance, and there is no justification for man. There is a reason the book of Acts comes after, right after, the four Gosples.

  • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

    As far as a society that considers it good to run from battle, consider the Buddhists.

    In "What Buddhist Believe," the Venerable Dhammananda wrote,
    "Buddhists should not be the aggressors even in protecting their religion or anything else. They must try their best to avoid any kind of violent act. Sometimes they may be forced to go to war by others who do not respect the concept of the brotherhood of humans as taught by the Buddha. They may be called upon to defend their country from external aggression, and as long as they have not renounced the worldly life, they are duty-bound to join in the struggle for peace and freedom. Under these circumstances, they cannot be blamed for becoming soldiers or being involved in defence. However, if everyone were to follow the advice of the Buddha, there would be no reason for war to take place in this world. It is the duty of every cultured person to find all possible ways and means to settle disputes in a peaceful manner, without declaring war to kill his or her fellow human beings."

    • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

      As far as a society that considered rape acceptable, look no further than societies in the bible. The following verse describes the judgment upon Babylon by the biblical god. Rape was acceptable to him.

      Isaiah 13:16
      New Living Translation (NLT)
      16 Their little children will be dashed to death before their eyes.
      Their homes will be sacked, and their wives will be raped.

      • http://youtu.be/zjgBhpanOfQ Despeville

        What would your baboon ancestor do Dodxon?

        • http://rationalresponses.blogspot.com/ Jeff Dixon

          You are the one who makes up stories, Humpty, not I.

  • Victor Barney

    Here's the truth from the Bible: America, as England is Israel by the seed of Joseph, not Judah(Gen. 48:16) proven by the FACT that England did become the largest empire in history, as only promised Joseph's seed, not Judah. I hate to bring this up in a poilitically correct evil world, but we, England's brother, had nothing left to do, but to appoint over it not only the "forbidden foreigner" of Deuteronomy 17:15, but also the self-professed "Anti-Christ"(marxist) over u.s. in Revelation, chapter 11. I find it just amazing that our more verbally endowd sex alone made this marxist takeover through the "democratic process," as the marxist love to say, possible! Welcome to Adam's world folks. Just saying… p.s. Next comes the two-witnesses of Revelation, chapter 11 to destroy u.s. because it is our CREATOR that will destroy u.s., NOT OBAMA & his marxist(Anti-Christ) promise made to our more verbaly edept sex. Look out for September 16, 2012 on the Feast of Trumpets(war). Just saying…

  • madmemere1

    It's pretty obvious, that OUR government (the current administration)never HAD any "common sense" to begin with and Congress has "misplaced" theirs.

  • don

    you still don't get it is it just that you cannot bring yourself to belive that one party the one at the helm right now wants an has planed for the fall of america as we love it. they are not stupit they have planed this an if WE don't wake up to that fact an do something we will become what the liberials want a solialist or commist counrty. an ALL freedom will be LOST