<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Researchers: Religion Deserves More Scientific Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/</link>
	<description>Where Christianity intersects with politics, culture, and entertainment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Wood</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-175116</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-175116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would be revolutionary]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be revolutionary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Wood</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-175115</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-175115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mormon doctrine teaches we are all born perfect without sin. Once in this world we are challenged by satan and his emissaries. Then and only then, do we chose the direction we take in our lives. It is not prejudiced by an ancestor who made a wrong choice.  If God exists, He would not permit His innocent child to carry such a burden.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mormon doctrine teaches we are all born perfect without sin. Once in this world we are challenged by satan and his emissaries. Then and only then, do we chose the direction we take in our lives. It is not prejudiced by an ancestor who made a wrong choice.  If God exists, He would not permit His innocent child to carry such a burden.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Wood</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-175113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-175113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science = Reason!  Religion seeks reason. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science = Reason!  Religion seeks reason. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millergroup2</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153735</link>
		<dc:creator>millergroup2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[keyboardshark  
 
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. The author of these writings is still alive. I have forwarded your feedback to him. If you get a chance, please leave a comment for him at the bottom of his pages, to help create a dialog. Thanks  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keyboardshark  </p>
<p>Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. The author of these writings is still alive. I have forwarded your feedback to him. If you get a chance, please leave a comment for him at the bottom of his pages, to help create a dialog. Thanks  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153713</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 05:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[millergroup2 says: &quot;Everyone please read this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://absolutivity.us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://absolutivity.us/&lt;/a&gt; The account of creation unrefuted!&quot;    
    
While the article is indeed interesting, if a bit technical, I would not necessarily say it &quot;proves&quot; the creation account, but rather it offers an explanation of how it unfolded.    
    
&quot;&lt;i&gt;The first event of creation was the creation of all the mass of the Universe in the form of the elemental particles, each particle imbued with a power of attraction.  The Universe was apparently filled uniformly with these invisible particles and they began attracting each other.  The particulate matter that was to become the earth was scattered over the Universe with the other particles.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;    
    
While I wholeheartedly believe 100% in the Biblical account of creation, I get a little uneasy when explanations of how it occurred are proposed which seem to appeal to physical processes in an attempt to theorize just how it occurred (&quot;&lt;i&gt;The Universe was apparently filled uniformly with these invisible particles and &lt;b&gt;they began attracting each other&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&quot;).     
    
While what the author says could be true, I do not believe the Bible gives us enough information to fill in the details of how Creation was actually accomplished. Instead of trying to understand the Creation in terms of processes that we as finite humans can understand, my opinion is that we only need know that it was a totally miraculous event which is beyond human understanding.    
    
I know you are sincerely trying to validate the truthfulness of the Bible&#039;s account of creation, my brother, and I am with you 100% on the truthfulness of that account.  I&#039;m not trying to invalidate your source, because it could have happened just as the author says. However, I believe it requires a bit too much of &#039;reading between the lines&#039; in my opinion. No offense intended, just my 2 cents FWIW. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>millergroup2 says: &quot;Everyone please read this, <a href="http://absolutivity.us/" rel="nofollow">http://absolutivity.us/</a> The account of creation unrefuted!&quot;    </p>
<p>While the article is indeed interesting, if a bit technical, I would not necessarily say it &quot;proves&quot; the creation account, but rather it offers an explanation of how it unfolded.    </p>
<p>&quot;<i>The first event of creation was the creation of all the mass of the Universe in the form of the elemental particles, each particle imbued with a power of attraction.  The Universe was apparently filled uniformly with these invisible particles and they began attracting each other.  The particulate matter that was to become the earth was scattered over the Universe with the other particles.</i>&quot;    </p>
<p>While I wholeheartedly believe 100% in the Biblical account of creation, I get a little uneasy when explanations of how it occurred are proposed which seem to appeal to physical processes in an attempt to theorize just how it occurred (&quot;<i>The Universe was apparently filled uniformly with these invisible particles and <b>they began attracting each other</b></i>&quot;).     </p>
<p>While what the author says could be true, I do not believe the Bible gives us enough information to fill in the details of how Creation was actually accomplished. Instead of trying to understand the Creation in terms of processes that we as finite humans can understand, my opinion is that we only need know that it was a totally miraculous event which is beyond human understanding.    </p>
<p>I know you are sincerely trying to validate the truthfulness of the Bible&#039;s account of creation, my brother, and I am with you 100% on the truthfulness of that account.  I&#039;m not trying to invalidate your source, because it could have happened just as the author says. However, I believe it requires a bit too much of &#039;reading between the lines&#039; in my opinion. No offense intended, just my 2 cents FWIW. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msjallen</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153650</link>
		<dc:creator>msjallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, ajfrench, you are absolutely right... 
1 Corinthians 2:14&#8230;.But the natural man (unbeliever) receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, ajfrench, you are absolutely right&#8230;<br />
1 Corinthians 2:14&hellip;.But the natural man (unbeliever) receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msjallen</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153649</link>
		<dc:creator>msjallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God created man perfect without sin. When the man and woman chose to sin everything went downhill from there. Man has not gotten better through so called evolutionary means but worse. There is more sin in this world today than there ever has been before and as a believer it takes a lot of Bible knowledge and dependency on God to overcome it. I appreciate all the knowledge scientist have come up with; especially in medicine and science can do all the studying they want but the Bible is still the greatest knowledge we need because it leads us to our savior. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God created man perfect without sin. When the man and woman chose to sin everything went downhill from there. Man has not gotten better through so called evolutionary means but worse. There is more sin in this world today than there ever has been before and as a believer it takes a lot of Bible knowledge and dependency on God to overcome it. I appreciate all the knowledge scientist have come up with; especially in medicine and science can do all the studying they want but the Bible is still the greatest knowledge we need because it leads us to our savior. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betz</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153557</link>
		<dc:creator>Betz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bravo...someone who is actually searching for truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo&#8230;someone who is actually searching for truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Walker</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/05/18/researchers-religion-deserves-more-scientific-study/#comment-153556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=19787#comment-153556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While few religionists will probably accept the finding, somebody&#039;s not paying attention to science (as usual).  Read the book, &quot;The Neuroscience of Religious Experience,&quot; by Patrick McNamara, Ph.D. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine.  
 
Patrick McNamara, Ph.D., is Director of the Evolutionary Neurobehavior Laboratory in the Department of Neurology at the BU School of Medicine and the VA New England HealthCare System. Upon graduating from the Behavioral Neuroscience Program at Boston University in 1991, he trained at the Aphasia Research Center at the Boston VA Medical Center in neurolinguistics and brain-cognitive correlation techniques. He then began developing an evolutionary approach to problems of brain and behavior and currently is studying the evolution of the frontal lobes, the evolution of the two mammalian sleep states (REM and NREM) and the evolution of religion in human cultures. He has published numerous articles and chapters on these topics pioneering the investigation of the role of the frontal lobes in the mediation of religious experience. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While few religionists will probably accept the finding, somebody&#039;s not paying attention to science (as usual).  Read the book, &quot;The Neuroscience of Religious Experience,&quot; by Patrick McNamara, Ph.D. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine.  </p>
<p>Patrick McNamara, Ph.D., is Director of the Evolutionary Neurobehavior Laboratory in the Department of Neurology at the BU School of Medicine and the VA New England HealthCare System. Upon graduating from the Behavioral Neuroscience Program at Boston University in 1991, he trained at the Aphasia Research Center at the Boston VA Medical Center in neurolinguistics and brain-cognitive correlation techniques. He then began developing an evolutionary approach to problems of brain and behavior and currently is studying the evolution of the frontal lobes, the evolution of the two mammalian sleep states (REM and NREM) and the evolution of religion in human cultures. He has published numerous articles and chapters on these topics pioneering the investigation of the role of the frontal lobes in the mediation of religious experience. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
