This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

Where Christianity intersects with politics, culture, and entertainment.


dallasexplo

When Evangelicals Were Cool

Historians often have problems dealing with popular culture. On the one hand, they know that novels, music albums, and even comics influence a vast audience, but there is always some embarrassment about treating them seriously in sober political accounts. In consequence, we tend to miss critical parts of major stories.

Here's a case in point. When we write the history of the United States in the twentieth century, it's hard to overstate the significance of the 1970s religious revival, which some call a Fourth Great Awakening. The movement gave a whole new social and political space to born-again Christianity, and we now have magnificent studies of the era like Darren Dochuk's recent case-study of Southern California in From Bible Belt to Sunbelt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism.

This is a great time to be studying modern American religion. But we still don't pay enough attention to some of the popular culture aspects of this era, above all in rock music.

Historians do a fine job of showing how Christian movements and leaders developed during these years, highly influential groups like Campus Crusade for Christ. But those groups faced a daunting challenge in reaching out to a non-believing audience that was at first deeply unsympathetic to the moral and cultural messages they preached. To say the least, the years around 1970 were not a promising time to be preaching chastity, heterosexuality, and a drug-free lifestyle, all the more so if the media stereotype of evangelical ministers was drawn from Inherit the Wind, Elmer Gantry, and even the homicidal pastor in Night of the Hunter.

Continue reading at www.realclearreligion.org
 
Posting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

If you find a comment offensive, please flag it as inappropriate by hovering over the down arrow to the right of that comment and clicking on the "Flag as inappropriate" text. Once a comment receives three "flags," it will be hidden from further view.

  • Robert De Leon

    I just wonder when "christian protestants" have been "cools"?
    Robert.

    • Despeville

      I just wonder if ever Roman Catholics who are not Christians per doctrines of pharaoh like popes were cool?

      • Robert De Leon

        Desperville:
        In several past comments I have cited many – I said many – passages from the Bible that is the foundation and pillar of my Catholic Faith. It won't be necessary to cite it again.
        In any part of the Bible we read “sola fide” (just Faith) nor “sola scripture” (just Scriptures). During 1500 years nobody talked or wrote about the term “sola”. But then two former Catholics came (Martin Luther and Jean Chauvin – John Calvin) and decided to “invent” such a term. Of course these people became heretics. That’s the problem with “evangelical, Christian, biblical protestants” As I told you before, you misguided and misunderstood Jesus Christ’s teachings. And still you have more sins. That’s why I said you are not cool (I don’t like this word but somehow defines a state of humor).
        As a Catholic I have the joy, richness, splendor and magnificence from the only Religion (I said the only) founded by God, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ.
        I’ll keep praying that you may understand this and convert.
        Robert.

        • Despeville

          DeMelon,

          You assert a lot of fluff but you cannot deliver a real stuff and that i s the center of your predicament. You think you have a real arguments but you do not and that is why each and every time those assertions of yours fail to deliver upon close biblical or historical examination causing you to withdraw and ignore them for you simply cannot withstand a deeper and factual examination because your religion is alien to the Gospel and so frequently counter Gospel while keeping the pretense and confusion by using biblical terms and methodologies. That is the case with 1 Timothy 3:15 where it was shown to you that "the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth." refers to a local church run by Timothy and not your to show up later corporate, religious moloch from Rome.

          You repeat your Roman anti reformation shibboleths but you really have no earthly idea of what you smear and caricature in your ignorance resulting from not knowing and not reading any serious and primary sources from Reformation but relying on pamphlets and books of your priests and Jesuits that twist and misrepresent the Reformation for the advancing of religious agenda and control of your papist religion of Rome. This is why you cannot ever quote factually from any of their works not can you discuss any of it. You are simply oblivious and ignorant of what you try to smear. In difference to you DeMelon I know you Roman Catholicism inside out experientially, theoretically and doctrinaly and I have been taught in Roman Church, have been reading primary works on Romanism including those of popes, have numerous discussion with priests and Roman PhDs. In short I do know what I am talking about when I criticize Romanism and I can back it up from all Roman sources, starting with your Catechism, to councils, to papal bulls and encyclicals to pope's books etc. You may assert your special Roman "gnosis" and deny that I actually do know what I am talking about but I can quickly show your lie by going to your own sources majority of which you do not even know and have not even read. So cut your pretense DeMelon.

          'In any part of the Bible we read “sola fide” (just Faith) nor “sola scripture” "

          :) :) :) SOLA FIDE stand for FAITH ALONE DeMelon and not "just Faith" it is time you learn the very basics of the Gospel that you attack in your ignorance… Also what is “sola scripture” Could you at least write correctly such widely known terms as SOLA SCRIPTURA which you do not understand just liek you do not understand any other remaining solas?

          'During 1500 years nobody talked or wrote about the term “sola”."

          That is a retarded rhetoric akin to Jehovah Witness who use the same illogical and in-factual shenanigan of "nobody wrote term "Trinity" :) Please and you deem yourself to be qualified to attack the Gospel? This is truly pathetic and laughable DeMelon. Get into your thick head that it is not the TERM but the CONCEPT behind the TERM and that concept is presented in PLENTY in the Scriptures and there is absolutely no conflict between it and the qualification of it contained in James 2. Here SOLA FIDE i.e FAITH ALONE in the Bible and just few examples for a mountain of them:

          • Despeville

            Continued:

            Here SOLA FIDE i.e FAITH ALONE in the Bible and just few examples for a mountain of them:

            "For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin."
            (Romans 3:20 ESV)

            "For we hold that one is justified BY FAITH APART from works of the law."
            (Romans 3:28 ESV)

            "For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did NOT come through the law but through the righteousness of FAITH."
            (Romans 4:13 ESV)

            "Therefore, since we have been justified BY FAITH, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ."
            (Romans 5:1 ESV)

            " Yet we know that a person is NOT justified by works of the law but THROUGH FAITH in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified BY FAITH in Christ and NOT by works of the law, because by works of the law NO ONE will be justified."
            (Galatians 2:16 ESV)

            For by GRACE you have been saved THROUGH FAITH. And this is NOT your own doing; it is the gift of God, NOT a result of works, so that NO ONE may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.
            (Ephesians 2:8-10 ESV)

            "He saved us, NOT because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own MERCY, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by his GRACE we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
            (Titus 3:5-7 ESV)

            "Now it is evident that NO ONE is justified before God by the law, for “The righteous shall live BY FAITH.”
            (Galatians 3:11 ESV)

            How much more proof do you need DeMelon and will you be following irrational manipulation of Jehovah Witnesses of "nobody talked or wrote about the term “sola”.? Your time is running out and on the Day of Wrath you will be standing ALONE along with your pitiful and useless works and then your will understand what ALONE meant.

          • Robert De Leon

            Desperville:
            1) I told you yesterday. "Do not throw food to the swine" as we read in the Bible.
            2) Before you were born I was reading the Bible in my home and listening the Bible in my church. When a catholic goes to Mass he/she pay attention to the 3 lectures from the Bible.
            3) Perhaps you know something from Catholicism but then you act for hatred. The best example is when you attack Jesuits, as a good child of the heretic Calvin. – He did the same just because Jesuits fought successfully to take many Calvinists back to the only Religion founded by God, Catholicism.
            4) I'll see you in Heaven – if you repent – knowing that your desire is to see me in Hell.
            5) I wonder why you dare to say that what I cite doesn’t belong to the Bible. Keep showing your Calvinist hatred.
            Robert.

            Robert.

          • Despeville

            DeMelon,

            Your utter failure to meaningfully and factually respond to any of my arguments and substantiated too is duly noticed and observed and I think not just by me. So know all of that suppose to be answered by me being a "swine", me being "hateful" and Roman Catholics sitting a the blasphemous mass? :) I think your irrationality and ignorance could not be displayed any better than this. Your Jesuits are criminals undermining whole countries and societies and history shows the same history your totally ignorant of.
            I have no desire to see anyone to go to hell but this is where you are going as of right now along with your filthy works and your idolatrous imagination that you can work your salvation for that is a demonic and damning "gospel" and not a Gospel of the Lord of Glory.

          • Despeville

            DeMelon,

            Here, reading something about what is going on in your church from "stupid" , "hateful" , Protestant "pigs" that absolutely have no idea what they talk about and never ever read the Scriptures either and do not know what is going on in Vatican:

            "The Vatican, a Nest of Crows?

            Every institution has its problems and conflicts.It is part of the fallen human condition to create on-going clashes between people, offices, and services that should work together. Sin is also able to create evil structures that manipulate and maneuver colleague against colleague, friend against friend, etc. The Church is no exception. Since its inception and until the Lord Jesus's second coming, the Church will also be a place of on-going inner conflicts. Martin Luther's definition of the Christian as simul iustus et peccator (i.e. righteous and sinner at the same time) also applies to the church as the body of Christ. The problem is that when the Church becomes something else other than what is supposed to be, its operations are often affected for the worse.

            Having said that, it is proper to ask: what on earth is happening at the Vatican? In the last few weeks and months, the Vatican has come out more than ever as a place of nasty power games between cardinals, wars between ecclesiastical groups, and mounting tensions around the Pope himself. The (lack of) spirituality of the Vatican's governance has become evident and many observers have easily pointed out to the ultimate showdown that is happening there. Leaving aside the moralistic tendency to judge out of ethical purism (if any organization is without sin, let it be the first to throw a stone, John 8:7), what can be said about this last outbreak of opaque Vatican affairs? "

            Source: http://www.reformation21.org/articles/vatican-fil

        • LouiseCA

          We're not saved by our works or anything that we may do to try to please Him. We do the works and live lives that are pleasing to Him, because we are saved by His Grace alone. We cannot add a single thing to His sacrifice on the Cross. He paid it all for us. We can earn rewards, but we cannot earn Heaven.

  • http://twitter.com/lambsev11 @lambsev11

    In the full article the author asks how the cultural gap was bridged by christian evangelists istarting in the early 1970's. He asks this question:

    "Divine intervention apart, how on earth did they manage it?"

    I am scratching my head that a christian and a professor could ask that question.

    John 15
    4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
    5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
    6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.
    7 If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.
    8 Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.

  • http://twitter.com/lambsev11 @lambsev11

    To Robert De Leon and Despeville, I understand something of the animosity you two have for each other. Fortunately the Roman Church never was able to get my allegiance and the reformed protestant church has lost her grip on me. I remain a follower of the Jesus the Messiah and Lord.

    Someone shared with me a very interesting observation about this "special" verse yesterday, the verse:

    Matthew 16:18
    And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

    The observation: Jesus says, "I will build my church…"

    Note this well. The church belongs to Jesus, it is HIS church. It does not belong to Rome or to the pope, to Geneva or to Calvin. It does not belong to Catholics or Protestants. It belongs to the Lord and Savior of act of it's members. It is Christ's body and not it's own for it was bought with a price, that being the precious blood of it's owner Jesus.

    The good news is that for those who believe Jesus and live by faith, Jesus belongs to them, He is their Lord, their High Priest, their Savior and their Messiah, indeed He is their King!

    If men would trade their devotion to other names (denominations) and other men (popes, theologians) and other writings (creeds catechisms, confessions and institutes), if they would abandon them all for the Name of Jesus, the persons of God, and the Holy Scriptures, their salvation would be more assured in their hearts and minds, and the could enjoy the like precious faith of Christ's Apostles again!

    • Despeville

      ' I remain a follower of the Jesus the Messiah and Lord. "

      Is that why you deny Triune God? Jesus is the Second Person of Trinity and is eternal and not created.

      'Someone shared with me a very interesting observation about this "special" verse yesterday, the verse: "

      I know who and with what assertion. It was a Roman Catholic who "shared" that with you… What a deep discovery Hurricane made for you… WOOW.

      ' It does not belong to Rome or to the pope, to Geneva or to Calvin. It does not belong to Catholics or Protestants. "

      You really have a super shallow approach to this issue and so caricature like. So you assume that this is all there is to this for which so many died? Gee those "idiots" going to Roman instigated and Rome serving fire pyres and by tens of thousands over the centuries where they were watching their own flush burn and their own blood boil were really clueless and stupid Lambserv11. If they would just have your depth and your understanding and such an immense perception of " if they would abandon them all for the Name of Jesus," and were not worshiping themselves or Luther or Calvin or De Bèze or Bullinger or Melanchthon or Farel or Cranmer or Lasco or Zwingli or etc. etc. etc. Is that what you think? Yes, indeed that is the conclusion of your incredible ignorance and devastating arrogance of the issues you have no earthly idea about yet you feel prompted to share your "wisdom"… Wow.

      Gee if only John Wycliffe would understand this wisdom of yours he would not have his remains dug up, burned, and the ashes cast into the River Swift 46 years after his death. If only Jan Hus had your deep wisdom and not "worship himself" but Jesus as you do (although it is an idol of yours as not part of One Triune God as you erroneously believe) he could save his life and not burn alive 100 years before Reformation while making a prophetic cry about Luther from his fire pyre! If only William Tyndale possessed your deep wisdom and such a penetration of the matter he would love Jesus as you do and would never been executed for the Gospel by strangulation…

      Jeez lambserv11 can you ever learn and move past your incredible ignorance and shallowness?