Comments on: Huckabee vs. Henson

By: Jeffrey Dixon

Jeffrey Dixon — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 04:56:00 +0000

I am simply using the verses.

By: Jeffrey Dixon

Jeffrey Dixon — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 04:53:00 +0000

And Disney has been feeling that financial burden for 20 years as well.

By: Sues

Sues — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:30:00 +0000

Hahaha. I've been boycotting Disney for over twenty years for as many reasons. Now here's another for the pile.

By: Sues

Sues — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:27:00 +0000

…………..Or at least before their god, money.

By: contessadetroy

contessadetroy — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:32:00 +0000

That's because they've made it very clear that we cannot coexist. It is either our way or their way. I'm not forgetting all the laws passed that force our children to learn their ways. Can't do that with the Christian way of life in the public schools or businesses anymore, can we? Even IF we are the majority. Nope. It's the minority that is allowed free speech and reign. Of COURSE we're going to fight that. For someone who seems to be for the rights of all, you certainly aren't, are you? Seems a hypocritical stance for someone who's accusing others of being hypocritical.

By: keyboardshark

keyboardshark — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:36:00 +0000

Banking is forbidden? Jesus didn't think so. In the parable of the talents, Jesus commended the two servants who invested the money the lord of the servants had given them to, but the servant who hid his share in the ground and did not invest it was condemned (Matthew 25:15-30). Why would tailors or barbers (I assume that's what you meant) be prohibited by the Bible? You'll have to explain that one further. As for women wearing men's clothes or vice versa, I would say you have Biblical justification on that one: "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God." Deuteronomy 22:5 Not sure why this would be a problem today. I definitely would not look good in a dress :-) Personally, I do not have any car loan or mortgage, as my car and house are fully paid, but I do not see why that would be an issue unless the amount of the debt exceeded the borrower's ability to repay. In that case, it might be an issue contrary to the Bible.

By: millergroup2

millergroup2 — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:28:00 +0000

Well good. Now we don't have to worry about these "fruties" bring their boy friends or girl friends to sit in front of my children on family eat out day. I would not care if every gay or frutie boycotted every establishment on the face of the earth. Go back to the closet where you belong, and lock the door.

By: Vladimir

Vladimir — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:14:00 +0000

Come on, Jeff Dixon, you are using your understanding of the scriptures as an attack on people who actually understand the scriptures.

By: Jeff Dixon

Jeff Dixon — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:30:00 +0000

Christians tolerate many activities that are fobidden in the bible. Banking, babers, tailors, and women wearing mens clothes for example. Yet it is the gays that drive Christians bonkers insisting that that gods laws MUST be followed. Do you have a car or home loan, Key? Why, since that is an abomination to your lord? Stop being a hypocrite.