<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher recalls David Barton book on Jefferson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/</link>
	<description>Where Christianity intersects with politics, culture, and entertainment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-177700</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-177700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-177698</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-177698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That law says the amount remains constant. But where did the mass/matter and energy originally come from? Since the amount of useful energy is constantly decreasing, there had to be a beginning point at which it was 100% useful energy, and then began immediately to decrease.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That law says the amount remains constant. But where did the mass/matter and energy originally come from? Since the amount of useful energy is constantly decreasing, there had to be a beginning point at which it was 100% useful energy, and then began immediately to decrease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174074</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you can prove conclusively that the speed of light has remained constant throughout history, let me know. Both a variable speed and a constant speed are based on assumptions about the unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable past, so it is impossible to verify either explanation with complete accuracy. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you can prove conclusively that the speed of light has remained constant throughout history, let me know. Both a variable speed and a constant speed are based on assumptions about the unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable past, so it is impossible to verify either explanation with complete accuracy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dixon</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not a law, but no one has found a variance in the speed of light either. Some theories are very,  very, very good at describing nature. As I said before, when you find that the speed of light has changed, let me know, ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a law, but no one has found a variance in the speed of light either. Some theories are very,  very, very good at describing nature. As I said before, when you find that the speed of light has changed, let me know, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174069</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. The speed of light being constant is not a law. Theories can be replaced by other theories, but laws do not change. Einstein&#039;s theory of relativity,  when first published, superseded a 200-year-old theory of mechanics stated by Isaac Newton.

The theory of relativity overturned the concept of motion from Newton&#039;s day, by positing that all motion is relative. Time was no longer uniform and absolute. Physics could no longer be understood as space by itself, and time by itself. Instead, an added dimension had to be taken into account with curved spacetime. Time now depended on velocity, and contraction became a fundamental consequence at appropriate speeds.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. The speed of light being constant is not a law. Theories can be replaced by other theories, but laws do not change. Einstein's theory of relativity,  when first published, superseded a 200-year-old theory of mechanics stated by Isaac Newton.</p>
<p>The theory of relativity overturned the concept of motion from Newton's day, by positing that all motion is relative. Time was no longer uniform and absolute. Physics could no longer be understood as space by itself, and time by itself. Instead, an added dimension had to be taken into account with curved spacetime. Time now depended on velocity, and contraction became a fundamental consequence at appropriate speeds.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dixon</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are not. Theories explain laws. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not. Theories explain laws. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174041</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theories are not Laws.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theories are not Laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keyboardshark</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174040</link>
		<dc:creator>keyboardshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it is true that the &lt;b&gt;quantity&lt;/b&gt; of energy remains the same, it can be transformed into another type of energy, but not destroyed. For example, the light energy of the sun is converted to chemical energy by plants, then animals eat the plants and their bodies convert that chemical energy into
mechanical energy.




The problem is, there are losses in the conversion process, and there are limits to the efficiency of the conversion of thermal energy to other forms of energy, as described by the second law of thermodynamics. Energy needs a device to transform it from one form to another (like the plant that uses photosynthesis) so this also limits its ability to convert.




The other problem is that stars are constantly expending energy, and at some point will have released all their energy. Now, think about what happens in the winter when the sun&#039;s rays are merely less direct away from the equator. It
gets cold, obviously. Now think of what would happen if the energy from the sun completely disappeared. The residual heat would all eventually dissipate into space as useless thermal energy, never to be recovered in a useful form again. 


So the eventual end (barring intervention by God) would be that the useful energy of the stars will be completely expended and converted to another form of energy. It eventually would all be converted to thermal energy and dissipated off into space as the energy from the stars ceased, or would be locked up in matter with no device or mechanism to convert it to another form as all matter approached absolute zero. Result? No more useful energy, but yet the same quantity of energy in the universe.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effort ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is true that the <b>quantity</b> of energy remains the same, it can be transformed into another type of energy, but not destroyed. For example, the light energy of the sun is converted to chemical energy by plants, then animals eat the plants and their bodies convert that chemical energy into<br />
mechanical energy.</p>
<p>The problem is, there are losses in the conversion process, and there are limits to the efficiency of the conversion of thermal energy to other forms of energy, as described by the second law of thermodynamics. Energy needs a device to transform it from one form to another (like the plant that uses photosynthesis) so this also limits its ability to convert.</p>
<p>The other problem is that stars are constantly expending energy, and at some point will have released all their energy. Now, think about what happens in the winter when the sun's rays are merely less direct away from the equator. It<br />
gets cold, obviously. Now think of what would happen if the energy from the sun completely disappeared. The residual heat would all eventually dissipate into space as useless thermal energy, never to be recovered in a useful form again. </p>
<p>So the eventual end (barring intervention by God) would be that the useful energy of the stars will be completely expended and converted to another form of energy. It eventually would all be converted to thermal energy and dissipated off into space as the energy from the stars ceased, or would be locked up in matter with no device or mechanism to convert it to another form as all matter approached absolute zero. Result? No more useful energy, but yet the same quantity of energy in the universe.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effort" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effort</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dixon</title>
		<link>http://zionica.com/2012/08/11/publisher-recalls-david-barton-book-on-jefferson/#comment-174036</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zionica.com/?p=20926#comment-174036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Einsteins special theory of relativity shows that the speed of light cannot change, it is a safe assumption. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Einsteins special theory of relativity shows that the speed of light cannot change, it is a safe assumption. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
